Comments on: AMERICA DIVIDED? NO, http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/ a site for people in their right mind Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:48:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Plinio http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-61113 Plinio Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:40:07 +0000 /?p=167#comment-61113 America is not a Country, it's a continent like Europa, Asia, Oceania, Africa. America is not a Country, it’s a continent like Europa, Asia, Oceania, Africa.

]]> By: Mr. Jack http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-8834 Mr. Jack Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:09:37 +0000 /?p=167#comment-8834 Danny, then how do you explain Homosexuality in the animal kingdom? It’s been shown that there is Homosexuality in animals like dogs, which cannot make an informed decision to be Gay or straight.

I think it’s safe to say that Homosexuality is both a product of Nature and Nurture.

]]> By: Danny http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-8825 Danny Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:14:03 +0000 /?p=167#comment-8825 To Suzanne: No one was ever born homosexual. It is nurture, not nature. What about the 45-50 year old women who were mistreated and dumped by their husbands and become manhating cohabitors with another woman all of a sudden? What about the thousands of ex-homosexuals? The two researchers who claimed genetic origins have both seen their work totally debunked. Think about it. To Suzanne: No one was ever born homosexual. It is nurture, not nature. What about the 45-50 year old women who were mistreated and dumped by their husbands and become manhating cohabitors with another woman all of a sudden? What about the thousands of ex-homosexuals? The two researchers who claimed genetic origins have both seen their work totally debunked. Think about it.

]]> By: Sean http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-3359 Sean Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:36:47 +0000 /?p=167#comment-3359 To Serb, It may not make a difference, but what you may or may not know is that after John Kerry publically distanced himself from this objection endorsed by Barbara Boxer; he then promptly went back to his quarters (or whatever you want to call them) and sent out a Bulk e-mail and mass phone calls to registered Democrat voters in Ohio to call their Congressmen to report voter irregularities or dis-enfranchisement. However, that's not what I was even trying to get across in my last e-mail. My point was summarized in the final paragraph, and that is: their objection may not make a difference, BUT it is exposing them for who they are and what they believe. It's exposing them for the kooks that they are. It's exposing the fact that they can accept defeat, and still think the election was stolen. They TALK about bi-partisanship and working with Bush and the Republicans, and then they try to undermine him. My point was simply they are showing their true colors with this move, and their blaring contradictions with election policy. They are also showing what they believe and who they side with with their defense of Al Qaeda terrorists, and fighting for Geneva Convention rights and protections for them when they clearly are not covered by the Geneva Convention. I'm going to get into this more in my next comment. :) To Serb,
It may not make a difference, but what you may or may not know is that after John Kerry publically distanced himself from this objection endorsed by Barbara Boxer; he then promptly went back to his quarters (or whatever you want to call them) and sent out a Bulk e-mail and mass phone calls to registered Democrat voters in Ohio to call their Congressmen to report voter irregularities or dis-enfranchisement. However, that’s not what I was even trying to get across in my last e-mail.
My point was summarized in the final paragraph, and that is: their objection may not make a difference, BUT it is exposing them for who they are and what they believe. It’s exposing them for the kooks that they are. It’s exposing the fact that they can accept defeat, and still think the election was stolen. They TALK about bi-partisanship and working with Bush and the Republicans, and then they try to undermine him.
My point was simply they are showing their true colors with this move, and their blaring contradictions with election policy.
They are also showing what they believe and who they side with with their defense of Al Qaeda terrorists, and fighting for Geneva Convention rights and protections for them when they clearly are not covered by the Geneva Convention. I’m going to get into this more in my next comment. :)

]]> By: Serb http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-3350 Serb Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:09:11 +0000 /?p=167#comment-3350 Of course, it wouldn't make a cent of difference either way considering Kerry called the dogs off BEFORE the count in Ohio had actually been finished. Of course, it wouldn’t make a cent of difference either way considering Kerry called the dogs off BEFORE the count in Ohio had actually been finished.

]]> By: Sean http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-3324 Sean Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:17:06 +0000 /?p=167#comment-3324 I'd like to change the focus real quickly on to the Left wing fringe (also known as the Democrat party :) ) who is now trying to futilly contest the Ohio presidential election, and it's 20 electoral votes. They are trying to claim that there was wide spread voter irregularity that there was voter dis-enfranchisement (a little 2000 and Jesse Jackson esk there, good work libs), they're trying to say that Bush stole the election again. I CAN'T believe that they are going to shoot themselves in the foot like this. There was no irregularities there was no dis-enfranchising of voters. Ohio, like the rest of the country, had record turn-out. After the recount Bush still has won by OVER 118,000 votes, and they still think this is election night and they can salvage this election. The only voter irregularity that there was in Ohio was in largely dominant democrat districts in which some of these districts reported more registered voters than eligible voters in their district. CAN ANYONE SAY VOTER FRAUD. This was also found in Philadelphia. They are also making a huge self-contradiction here with this objection (or hail mary pass if you prefer). Let me explain. Remember back to the much debated election of 2000 when Al Gore won the popular vote, and many democrats suggested that we scrap the electoral college and only elect presidents with the popular vote (this is a terrible idea by the way but that's another discussion). Now, in 2004 Bush won the popular vote by over 3 MILLION votes! I don't here any democrats saying, "Yep, Bush won, he got the popular vote." NO, now they are reverting back to the electoral college system and saying that Bush didn't win Ohio's 20 electoral votes so he shouldn't be re-elected even though he won the popular vote! They are showing their TRUE COLORS here people; pay attention. They are appealing to their wacko, kook base with this objection. They are still trying to declare Bush illegitamate. They can't handle loosing, and they don't know how to win. I’d like to change the focus real quickly on to the Left wing fringe (also known as the Democrat party :) ) who is now trying to futilly contest the Ohio presidential election, and it’s 20 electoral votes.
They are trying to claim that there was wide spread voter irregularity that there was voter dis-enfranchisement (a little 2000 and Jesse Jackson esk there, good work libs), they’re trying to say that Bush stole the election again.

I CAN’T believe that they are going to shoot themselves in the foot like this. There was no irregularities there was no dis-enfranchising of voters. Ohio, like the rest of the country, had record turn-out. After the recount Bush still has won by OVER 118,000 votes, and they still think this is election night and they can salvage this election.
The only voter irregularity that there was in Ohio was in largely dominant democrat districts in which some of these districts reported more registered voters than eligible voters in their district. CAN ANYONE SAY VOTER FRAUD. This was also found in Philadelphia.
They are also making a huge self-contradiction here with this objection (or hail mary pass if you prefer). Let me explain. Remember back to the much debated election of 2000 when Al Gore won the popular vote, and many democrats suggested that we scrap the electoral college and only elect presidents with the popular vote (this is a terrible idea by the way but that’s another discussion). Now, in 2004 Bush won the popular vote by over 3 MILLION votes! I don’t here any democrats saying, “Yep, Bush won, he got the popular vote.” NO, now they are reverting back to the electoral college system and saying that Bush didn’t win Ohio’s 20 electoral votes so he shouldn’t be re-elected even though he won the popular vote!
They are showing their TRUE COLORS here people; pay attention. They are appealing to their wacko, kook base with this objection. They are still trying to declare Bush illegitamate. They can’t handle loosing, and they don’t know how to win.

]]> By: Serb http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-3321 Serb Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:30:23 +0000 /?p=167#comment-3321 Problem is that people are, more than ever, divided on partisan lines about some of the hotter issues that its questionable the government can actually (legally) effect - hot issues such as gay marriage, stem cell research, and abortion. People's opinions are steadfast and untouchable on these positions, and that's the reason the country is divided - not simply diverse. Though we are a diverse nation, which helps us in many cases, in this case we are handicapped by it. Vive le Freedom all the way, but sometimes all the exercising of the First Amendment annoys me a bit too much. Problem is that people are, more than ever, divided on partisan lines about some of the hotter issues that its questionable the government can actually (legally) effect – hot issues such as gay marriage, stem cell research, and abortion. People’s opinions are steadfast and untouchable on these positions, and that’s the reason the country is divided – not simply diverse. Though we are a diverse nation, which helps us in many cases, in this case we are handicapped by it. Vive le Freedom all the way, but sometimes all the exercising of the First Amendment annoys me a bit too much.

]]> By: Dynazka - A non-speller http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-3320 Dynazka - A non-speller Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:08:59 +0000 /?p=167#comment-3320 I'm actually writing a reportish thing for my AP Government class, and I knew where I was going with it. I tried to explain on my paper that the country isn't divided. Just diverse. In this country, we are allowed to form our own oppinions without fear of prosecution. That's one of the things that makes this country great. Look at Iraq for example. For years, they held 'elections'... You got a peice of paper and it read something to the effect of "I want Saddam to be president, Yes. No." And you were surrounded by guards. How intimidating would that be? You could see why under 1% of people voted NO. Anyway... I agree with Suzanne. We have a right to agree to disagree, and we're taking full advantage of that. Anyway. Gotta run. Ciao. I’m actually writing a reportish thing for my AP Government class, and I knew where I was going with it. I tried to explain on my paper that the country isn’t divided. Just diverse.

In this country, we are allowed to form our own oppinions without fear of prosecution. That’s one of the things that makes this country great. Look at Iraq for example. For years, they held ‘elections’… You got a peice of paper and it read something to the effect of “I want Saddam to be president, Yes. No.” And you were surrounded by guards. How intimidating would that be? You could see why under 1% of people voted NO. Anyway…

I agree with Suzanne. We have a right to agree to disagree, and we’re taking full advantage of that. Anyway. Gotta run.

Ciao.

]]> By: Suzanne Katz http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-2249 Suzanne Katz Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:50:02 +0000 /?p=167#comment-2249 Hi anonymous NOW SOMEONE WROTE SOMETHING THAT IS ENTIRE IDEA BEHIND AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU all caps to make a point. comment 34 Hi anonymous NOW SOMEONE WROTE SOMETHING THAT IS ENTIRE IDEA BEHIND AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU
all caps to make a point.
comment 34

]]> By: Serb Militant http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/america-divided-no/#comment-2248 Serb Militant Sat, 27 Nov 2004 23:54:38 +0000 /?p=167#comment-2248 Above was me.. I don't know why it won't sign in automatically. Above was me.. I don’t know why it won’t sign in automatically.

]]>