How’s this for an October surprise?
While John Kerry is running around claiming President George Bush and our troops overseas failed the American people by not guarding an explosives dump without explosives in it, documents have been uncovered at Texas Tech University that show Kerry was following Vietnam War protest guidelines from North Vietnamese communists in the early 1970s.
“Wait! Why am I not seeing any of this in the national news media, Mr. Gaylon?” you might be asking. “This cannot be true. Our Democrat candidate for president surely wasn’t on the side of the communists and carrying out their requests when he got home from valiantly fighting for his country and winning all those medals, was he?”
Yes, he was.
The documents — which actually LOOK like they came from the 1970s and not from a Microsoft Word program — were found at the Vietnam Center at Texas Tech University in Lubbock and reproduced from captured communist records. These documents have been PROVEN 100 percent authentic BEFORE their release, unlike those 60 Minutes National Guard documents that CBS refuses to investigate. They show that Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Viet Cong provisional governor of South Vietnam at the Paris Peace Talks, delivered a plan from Le Duc Tho — Ho Chi Minh’s second in command — for American anti-war activities that anti-war protesters followed to the letter.
These documents are available at www.worldnetdaily.com or www.wintersoldier.com and show anti-war protesters not only received approval from the communists in North Vietnam, but also their direction. One of the documents states, “The spontaneous antiwar movements in the U.S. have received assistance and guidance from the friendly (i.e. communist Vietnamese) delegations at the Paris Peace Talks.”
Another article at www.nysun.com/article/3756 also reflects on the North Vietnamese anti-war coordination with protest groups.
By the way, Madame Binh subsequently became the Minister of Information for the People’s Republic of Vietnam after Saigon fell. You know what “Minister of Information” means in communist countries, right?
Of these organizations, the Vietnam Veterans Against the War and the communist organizations Peoples Committee for Peace and Justice and National Peace Action Committee were represented at the talks. Some representatives of these groups had their airfare covered by the United States Communist Party.
Shortly after Kerry returned from the talks he delivered Madame Binh’s peace proposal through a press conference on July 22, 1971. He did so with veterans’ families around him, a tactic that was suggested by the communists. However, he said he only attended the peace talks because he was on his honeymoon in Paris.
There are two problems, Hanoi John met twice, and possibly thrice, with communist officials in Paris. Also, his honeymoon was spent at the Jamaica home of the Pershing family with then (other) heiress wife, Julia Thorne, in 1970. I suppose Paris was a second honeymoon.
Kerry had also met illegally with Binh in 1970 while he was still a Naval officer on inactive reserve status, and in fact, all his meetings were under the six-year window of the term of his enlistment. This precludes him from even running for elective office, much less president, but nobody is mentioning it for some reason. Amendment 14, Section 3 states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-president, having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
Other documents show the Hanoi plan for war protests, which was basically accepted and carried out by PCPJ, NPAC and VVAW and other protest groups, which eventually forced a vastly superior military force to capitulate to a sniveling gang of thugs because of propaganda and lies.
It was John Kerry’s finest hour.
So Kerry’s earnest presidential campaign begins and ends the same place it started: Vietnam. And the whole way, the national liberal news media have ignored his crimes. They are overlooking this new evidence while inflating a bogus charge from the United Nations against the president during a time of war. Kerry is helping spread the lie, again, working against his government for his own purposes.
Those who think this man is even an American — much less are willing to vote for him — ought to have their heads examined. But then again, so few people on the left even know what it means to BE American anymore that I doubt Kerry’s activities alarm, surprise or offend them. There is a growing body in the Democrat Party that sees nothing wrong with subservience to the United Nations on any and all issues. For them, Kerry must be a revelation.
But for Americans who do not trust an organization so guilty of greed, glorification of communism, thuggery, deception, virulent anti-Semitism and corruption, Kerry is anathema. His pursuit of the presidency should never have been allowed, but for all the left-wing propagandists in the media. They’ve refused to do their jobs and we’re paying the price with a lousy, traitorous Democrat candidate.
John Kerry took the direction of a foreign government in protesting one war and now he’s doing it again. This time, as with the last, he is a willing puppet of people opposed to American strength.
John Kerry is on the wrong side again, folks. I hope on Nov. 2 you’re on the right one.
JD Says: October 31st, 2004 at 4:40 pm
Amen to this, Zack. But it begs the question: What next? If all we know about Kerry hasn’t mattered what can we expect from his presidency? Considering the pass Clinton got from the liberal media will we be subject to a spin cycle that never ends? No matter what this guy does, or more importantly doesn’t do, won’t the media find blame elsewhere rather than ever admit the writing was on the wall? It really leaves a thoughtful person feeling hopeless.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: October 31st, 2004 at 6:20 pm
Who killed more of the enemy in Vietnam? George Bush or John Kerry.
John Kerry protested an injust war. Get over it.
If 1971 is an issue. Let’s talk about George Bush getting drunk, screwing everything that moved, paying for his girlfriend to get an abortion, and snorting cocaine. 1971, it was a very good year indeed.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: October 31st, 2004 at 7:08 pm
I agree with you for once, JD, you’re hopeless.
JD Says: October 31st, 2004 at 7:41 pm
Oh common Fergy, where is your sense of humor?
JD Says: October 31st, 2004 at 7:45 pm
Ok Ferguson, I will play along. Do this for me. I want you to give me exactly one example of what Bush has done that will convince me, or anybody else for that matter, that he is a fascist. No long drawn out speaches. Just one example. And be specific.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: October 31st, 2004 at 8:11 pm
As I said in another thread, JD, you’re old and your ability to reason is so degraded by years of neglect that I’m really not interested in arguing with you.
For instance, by the very wording of your ridiculous question you demonstrate that you are foolish enough to believe that you can point to a single act and conclude proof of fascism. That would be like telling the prosecution in the Scott Peterson case that they must produce one single compelling piece of evidence that proves that Scott Peterson murdered his wife.
Fascism is a complex concept. It involves multiple characteristics. I posted 14 of them. You’ve yet to make any substantive response to any of those characteristics, other than to express your utterly delusional belief that the Republican party is not nationalist. You haven’t posted your own definition of fascism. You can run but you can’t hide, JD. Don’t drink the Kool-Aid!
Jonathan Ferguson Says: October 31st, 2004 at 8:15 pm
Well said JD, that must be what your brain feels like when you are actually forced to reason. “test” …. “test” …. “test” …. “Is this thing on?”
JD Says: October 31st, 2004 at 8:18 pm
Boy Ferguson you are angry today. I can’t get this dang thing to send my post. Maybe you are right I am too old.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: October 31st, 2004 at 8:22 pm
Angry? Couldn’t be happier. The Skins are up by 10 (or were last time I checked.) Kerry’s going to win. I’m horse whipping a few outgunned Republicans. What do I possibly have to be angry about?
Jonathan Ferguson Says: October 31st, 2004 at 8:23 pm
dangit, typed too fast again
‘Skins are DOWN by 10′
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 1st, 2004 at 10:05 am
The explosives weren’t in the dump? So that imbed camera crew that videotaped big crates of explosives is a myth created by the left wing conspiracy, I guess?
The explosives were there. Il Dubya ignored his generals and didn’t have enough troops on the ground to guard the sites. Nor did he think that a massive arms depot warranted security, so the soldiers came and went without securing or destroying a damn thing. If Clinton did that, he would be impeached. Bush does it, Giuliani blames the troops for it, the story lasts about 48 hours and disappears. And you lemmings have the nerve to claim that there is a LIBERAL bias in the media??? Give me a break!
JD Says: November 1st, 2004 at 12:38 pm
Ferguson, the amount of explosives that where on that film didn’t amount to more than a few tons. They have already said they destroyed most of the stuff at that dump. The IAEC has revised the amount “missing” to about 3 tons so that jives with the video “proof”. Get your facts straight before you come here. And knock off the bloviating. Nobody wants to read the same rants over and over.
JD Says: November 1st, 2004 at 12:39 pm
And yes Ferguson, at 33 you are a snot knosed kid.
Allison Says: November 1st, 2004 at 5:28 pm
Being 33 doesn’t make anyone a snot “knosed” kid. At 33, I had five kids and was voting for who I thought would make things better for my family. But I was wrong, Republicans didn’t make things better. Fortunately Clinton made it to the White House without my vote, and tomorrow my vote will count for someone who will do a better job than Bush ever could. One thing I have noticed, the Republican campaign makes fun of Kerry and Edwards at every opportunity and they act so smug in doing so, while all Bush can say for himself is, “You know where I stand”. His response to Bin Laden’s tape was stupid and arrogant, as if his words alone will keep us safe from Bin Laden’s threats. People, terrorism is a whole new ball game. We will never win by playing by the old rules while the terrorists don’t play by the rules at all. Someone has to come up with a new strategy. It is part of moving into the new millenium. Bush will never change because he thinks it’s macho to stick to his guns and not budge.He’s like a fly stuck on flypaper and he doesn’t even realize he’s stuck because he’s not moving. Or else he knows he’s stuck and he thinks he’s fooling the world by pretending that he’s not, or hoping no one will notice, so he laughs nervously while trying to get everyone’s attention off of his predicament.
newer steve Says: November 1st, 2004 at 5:34 pm
I grow weary of Fergys vapid and incessant political graffiti. Im not in favor of a poll tax but can we have an iq test before we allow people to post here, that will surly discourage Fergy. Perhaps we can tie in to the “Tickle” IQ pop-up and make Fergy get above 90 before he can post one of his moronic polemics. But, this time, lets make sure his 8 year old cousin doesnt take the test for him like what happened when he cheated on his application to University of Phoenix.
Allison Says: November 1st, 2004 at 5:50 pm
That is just the kind of snide and rude comment one would expect of a right winger. Nothing constructive or helpful, just poison. The kind of thing that destroys a nation. Judgmental drivel. And you could learn to spell “surely” while you’re spouting about moronic polemics. See, liberals just want to point out that there might be a better way to do things, but conservatives have a “holier-than-thou” attitude that prevents them from ever seeing that possibility, so that if they’re wrong, they will stay wrong.
Me Says: November 1st, 2004 at 6:31 pm
Umm Allision you have yet to impress me. Check this out…
See, liberals just want to point out that there might be a better way to do things, but conservatives have a “holier-than-thou” attitude that prevents them from ever seeing that possibility, so that if they’re wrong, they will stay wrong.
Ok great point, yet their is a problem with it. Its your opinion and your opinion really dosent matter as much as you would like it to. Its not a fact therfore its just a worthless assertion. So tell me how do you like this phrase:
See, conservatives just want to point out that there might be a better way to do things, but liberals have a “holier-than-thou” attitude that prevents them from ever seeing that possibility, so that if they’re wrong, they will stay wrong.
Wow, what do you know, just another worthless assertion! Hmmm…. my opinion is that you think about what you type here next time instead of just trying to act like you know what your talking about. See we “Conservatives” like fatcs not meaningless assertions, and we dont like to talk unless we have something worthwhile to say. If you werent to busy shooting off at the mouth about stupid stuff that dosent matter, you may have caught this lesson a little earlier in life.
So allision have a great day, tell the kids I said hi, and think before you type something on here next time because I wouldnt want you to waste any of your precious time with the kids.
Your Fellow American,
ME
Serbian National Says: November 1st, 2004 at 8:24 pm
Hey Fergy, good to meet you. Considering we have the NRA on our side, I’d say that we’re the ones with the guns.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 1st, 2004 at 9:26 pm
Me
Here’s an assertion for you.
Under Bill Clinton, we had 8 years of unprecedented peace, prosperity, and economic growth.
Under George Bush we have been attacked by terrorists, abandoned by our historical allies, our military is overextended, we’ve lost net jobs for the first time in history, we’ve gone from a massive surplus to a massive deficit, our environment is degraded, our educational system isn’t fully funded, our first responders are being cut, etc., etc., there’s a hundred more.
And stop calling yourself a conservative. You’re not one. You’re a neo-fascist. The implementation of your ideas has gutted this once great country. President Bush is a fascist alcoholic cheerleader. Your appeasement of this tyrant makes you a coward and a fool.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 1st, 2004 at 10:10 pm
A Note from Michael Moore:
To Decent Conservatives and Recovering Republicans:
In your heart of hearts you know Bush is a miserable failure. From having no plan on what to do in Iraq once he conquered Baghdad to the 380 missing tons of explosives that could be used to kill our brave young men and women, this guy doesn’t have a clue how to fight and win a war. You should see the mail I’ve been getting lately from our troops over there. They know how much the Iraqi people hate them. They are sitting ducks anytime they go out on the road. Many believe we are not that far away from a Tet-style offensive inside the Green Zone with hundreds of Americans and Brits killed.
Bush refused to go after and capture Osama bin Laden. He fought, every step of the way, the investigation into the 9/11 attacks. Who on earth would oppose such a thing? If 3,000 people died at your place of work and your boss said we don’t need to find out why or how it happened, he’d be thrown out on his ear. Bush’s behavior after this great tragedy alone is reason enough for his removal.
You already know that George W. Bush is the farthest thing from a conservative. He’s a reckless spender who has run up record-breaking deficits and the biggest debt in our history. He believes in having the government pry into everything from your library records to your bedroom. He has hit you with hidden taxes with his tax cuts for the rich.
I know many of you don’t like Bush, but are unsure of Kerry. Give the new guy a chance. He won’t raise your taxes (unless you are super-rich), he won’t take your hunting gun away, he won’t make you visit France. He risked his life for you many years ago. He’s asking for the chance to do it again. Scott McConnell at The American Conservative magazine has endorsed him. What more do you need?
JD Says: November 1st, 2004 at 10:51 pm
Earth to Ferguson: Get a job and make something of yourself! You are a Michael Moore wanabee and are about as inconsequential.
Anonymous Says: November 1st, 2004 at 11:08 pm
Jonathen, I dont know who you consider to be super rich, but 200k a year in a state like California for instance is not super rich. JFK is a typical tax and spend liberal who wont stop with the 200k or above crowd. The few trillion he already has earmarked for additional Socialist crap this country does not need will require taxing the H*ll out of the rest of America as well. If you want free health care go to Canada (it sucks!!!!) W has done more for this economy with his tax relief then you will ever understand. Can you imagine what Sep 11th, 2 wars, the .com bubble etc. will do to the economy of a nation? Kerry was a traitor to this country in the early 70′s and the remarks that he has made recently to discredit the great efforts of W and our heroic Millitary is enough to drive me crazy. That you would vote for some commie lovin’ traitorous ketchup boy says a lot about your conviction.
newer steve Says: November 1st, 2004 at 11:12 pm
Ally you are way too serious. I don’t think my small derision of Fergys specious platitudes was that harsh. Also I never claimed to be a good speller. It takes way too much time to use a spell checker and besides im hooked on phonics. However I think ME has a great point: I really don’t hear a lot of substance coming from the left, just meaningless and fungible prattle. Fungible as ME proved scientifically in his previous missive. Also I didn’t know Germany and France were historical allies – thanks for that. Also Im not a conservative as Im pro-choice, pro-porn, and I don’t go to church. However I guess I am a fascist by Fergys definition because I follow logic based on imperial evidence and don’t pin my political beliefs on the way “I wish” the world to be ignoring pesky reality. Wawaaa.
newer steve Says: November 1st, 2004 at 11:16 pm
Also isnt there a more appropritate liberal board in which Fergy can cut and paste his “Time magazine” like excerpts. I mean Fergy you have yet to say anything you didnt rehash out of Mother Jones, Utne Reader, or The Working Man Today. Newsflash: its not illegal to think for yourself bro. Thinking is hard but its worth the effort as you are able to come to your own conclutions and not those of a magazine which is basically “Highlights” for “adults”.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 1st, 2004 at 11:52 pm
Neutered Steve
No, you are a fascist by my definition because you support a fascist alcoholic cheerleader for president.
If you don’t know what fascism is, which you seem not to, go here and find out: http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 1st, 2004 at 11:58 pm
Neutered Steve
It might be legal to think for yourself now, Steve, but give Il Dubya 4 more years and we’ll see.
Loyalty oaths, branding all of his opponents traitors, jailing peaceful protestors, countless other examples of ‘expression suppression’ by this administration.
Anyway, if you support an administration that meets the 14 characteristics of a fascist regime listed here http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm then yes, I guess you are a fascist (and a cowardly lemming fool) by my definition.
Don’t drink the Kool-Aid!
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 12:01 am
JD, I have a job, thanks. Like many in the Bush economy I am underemployed, but I’m in a lot better position than a lot of folks, and I count my blessings.
Besides, right now I can’t think of any more important job than getting John Kerry elected and taking my country back.
newer steve Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 2:06 am
Fergy your like a collage of Moore, Chomsky, and Debs all rolled up into one. By the wow why am I cowardly?
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 3:00 am
Neutered Steve
Fascists rely on fear to keep their ‘supporters’ in line. Consequently, the most cowardly members of the populace are the first to embrace and last to reject a fascist regime.
You are neo-fascist Republicans because you are scared and this president makes you feel safe.
You hide in your FoxNews Freerepublic talk radio masturbatory delusional bubble because you’re afraid of the truth. You are indeed a coward.
Keith Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 5:41 am
Who here is voting for Bush? What state are most of you people from?
Emory Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 5:50 am
I’m from Georgia and will be voting against Kerry.
skuured Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 6:00 am
Im neither a conservative, a facist, nor a coward, but by flippantly throwing labels around you discredit any valid point you may have. Also stop being so angry.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 8:25 am
Who’s angry? I couldn’t be happier. It’s George Bush’s last day as fascist cheerleader in chief.
After today, he’s just a lame f*ck.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 9:01 am
Calling a spade a spade isn’t ‘flippantly throwing labels around.’ I posted my definition of fascist, I have yet to hear from a single Republican willing to make the case that the 14 characteristics of a fascist government don’t apply to the Bush administration.
You come to a website called ‘Laugh at Liberals,’ you outnumber us at least 10 to 1, and the best you can come up with is: ‘Boo hoo, you hurt my feelings!’? That says a lot about your candidate and your motives for voting for him.
You’d rather be stubborn and wrong than flexible and right. Just like your alcoholic cheerleader.
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 9:27 am
skurred
You’re not a coward? Then why the all-too-accurate moniker? Was turrified taken?
Jonathan Ferguson Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 9:29 am
“And a political candidate who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not a person you want as your Commander-in-Chief.” – George W. Bush
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
JD Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 1:45 pm
Ferguson they say never argue with a fool. Someone might hear you and not know the difference. That, my young friend, is the problem with you. I have taken it as far as I can and frankly you are an incorrigible fool. I only hope the best for you in your life because you are going to need it. But I won’t waste anymore time on you. Good Luck.
echotango Says: November 2nd, 2004 at 10:43 pm
First: The full name of the NAZI party was the National Socialist German Workers Party. Second, read the translations of Hitler’s speeches and you find that he and JOHN KERRY have a lot in common. The unwashed angry white men in this election smahing windows ans burning lawns have been LIBERALS. This is the election that will get Hitler into the Chencellorry. From there all Kerry has to do is wit for a new 9/11, enact certain executive orders that have been on the books since KENNEDY and voila, he is DER FUHRER!
Suzanne Katz Says: November 5th, 2004 at 3:45 am
OCTOBER SURPRISE
Zack, wish you would start writing my comments,
I loved what you wrote, and odd, I actually agree with everything you wrote.
Suzanne