<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bipartisanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/</link>
	<description>a site for people in their right mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kolran</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-157806</link>
		<dc:creator>Kolran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-157806</guid>
		<description>I feel bad for Dr. Nutslikebush&#039;s Son... Poor kid has no chance of fitting in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel bad for Dr. Nutslikebush&#8217;s Son&#8230; Poor kid has no chance of fitting in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChinaHill</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134350</link>
		<dc:creator>ChinaHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134350</guid>
		<description>I realize because of my lack of sophistication and because I reside in your mentally constructed cave, you think I would not possibly discern the purpose of placing the IF poem by Kipling immediately after my Bipartisanship poem. Or maybe you, like some liberals, practice the art of &quot;non sequiturism&quot; to insert a &quot;red herring&quot; so you do not have to address the issues being discussed. Was the Kipling poem inserted here to make a warm fuzzy or did it have some other liberal typical purpose? Are we on a different sheet of music now and I have to learn new rules or are you still trying to convince all of us here that you and the other liberal &quot;innocents&quot; really desire bipartisanship. 

I teach literature at the university where I work. I put together the text for the course. The first semester is poetry. The text has four Kipling poems in it, one being IF. Now, once again we have a liberal making suggestions to someone he is clueless about. Please go back and count how many times I have given you advise or made suggestions on what you should or should not do. My brother suggest I do a lot of things daily and he, too, is very much a superior being known as a liberal. Only such a person who honestly believes he or she is superior or actually has some authority dare make suggests on what people should or should not do. 

My comment on the poem was to point out that just because you think you are right, especially in the political arena, does not make you right. Both of us cannot possibly be right. But then again, I am not the one who is calling people liars without evidence. Most of the time I simply have said that some liberals may be a tad bit biased in their thinking. If these same liberals would admit that they are biased, I would not be so down on their philosophy. I simply have met very few liberals who will admit they are wrong. Notice Murtha did not admit he was wrong and apologize, he simply stated, &quot;the surge is working.&quot;  

My theory on this inability to admit one&#039;s mistakes publicly is very simple and very biased. The liberal philosophy is tied together with knots of lies like a giant quilt. If one of those knots come lose, the whole thing will come crashing down so those who are caught in lies tap dance, rationalize or discount to keep from admitting they are wrong. I believe firmly that the whole liberal philosophy is based upon lies. 

Just curious, Dr. Nutslikebush, is it because who have not challenged me enough here and that is why I am still hanging around. Once you give me a challenge, do you still expect me to leave? That fairy dust can be very bothersome, huh ;-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize because of my lack of sophistication and because I reside in your mentally constructed cave, you think I would not possibly discern the purpose of placing the IF poem by Kipling immediately after my Bipartisanship poem. Or maybe you, like some liberals, practice the art of &#8220;non sequiturism&#8221; to insert a &#8220;red herring&#8221; so you do not have to address the issues being discussed. Was the Kipling poem inserted here to make a warm fuzzy or did it have some other liberal typical purpose? Are we on a different sheet of music now and I have to learn new rules or are you still trying to convince all of us here that you and the other liberal &#8220;innocents&#8221; really desire bipartisanship. </p>
<p>I teach literature at the university where I work. I put together the text for the course. The first semester is poetry. The text has four Kipling poems in it, one being IF. Now, once again we have a liberal making suggestions to someone he is clueless about. Please go back and count how many times I have given you advise or made suggestions on what you should or should not do. My brother suggest I do a lot of things daily and he, too, is very much a superior being known as a liberal. Only such a person who honestly believes he or she is superior or actually has some authority dare make suggests on what people should or should not do. </p>
<p>My comment on the poem was to point out that just because you think you are right, especially in the political arena, does not make you right. Both of us cannot possibly be right. But then again, I am not the one who is calling people liars without evidence. Most of the time I simply have said that some liberals may be a tad bit biased in their thinking. If these same liberals would admit that they are biased, I would not be so down on their philosophy. I simply have met very few liberals who will admit they are wrong. Notice Murtha did not admit he was wrong and apologize, he simply stated, &#8220;the surge is working.&#8221;  </p>
<p>My theory on this inability to admit one&#8217;s mistakes publicly is very simple and very biased. The liberal philosophy is tied together with knots of lies like a giant quilt. If one of those knots come lose, the whole thing will come crashing down so those who are caught in lies tap dance, rationalize or discount to keep from admitting they are wrong. I believe firmly that the whole liberal philosophy is based upon lies. </p>
<p>Just curious, Dr. Nutslikebush, is it because who have not challenged me enough here and that is why I am still hanging around. Once you give me a challenge, do you still expect me to leave? That fairy dust can be very bothersome, huh <img src='http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutslikebush</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134191</link>
		<dc:creator>nutslikebush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134191</guid>
		<description>Imagine a military propagandizing a defeat as a victory.  You do make a good point, ChinaHill.  But if your only comment on Kipling&#039;s great poem is that he was too patriotic (that, indeed, was a criticism of Kipling even by his contemporaries), I suggest you read it again and just think about what it means for you.  I didn&#039;t post it to provoke you or to say that it was about you in any way.  I posted it because I truly think it is a poem that offers us all much to think about and it can be inspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a military propagandizing a defeat as a victory.  You do make a good point, ChinaHill.  But if your only comment on Kipling&#8217;s great poem is that he was too patriotic (that, indeed, was a criticism of Kipling even by his contemporaries), I suggest you read it again and just think about what it means for you.  I didn&#8217;t post it to provoke you or to say that it was about you in any way.  I posted it because I truly think it is a poem that offers us all much to think about and it can be inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutslikebush</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134099</link>
		<dc:creator>nutslikebush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134099</guid>
		<description>ChinaHill, you are amazing.  Of course everyone who had a high school English course knows the history of the poem.  But my family enjoys and finds new meaning in this poem each time we read it together.  It is hanging over my son&#039;s bed and we read it before he goes to sleep at night.  I personally think it is a wonderful way to approach life and encompasses the values I want my children to embrace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ChinaHill, you are amazing.  Of course everyone who had a high school English course knows the history of the poem.  But my family enjoys and finds new meaning in this poem each time we read it together.  It is hanging over my son&#8217;s bed and we read it before he goes to sleep at night.  I personally think it is a wonderful way to approach life and encompasses the values I want my children to embrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChinaHill</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134041</link>
		<dc:creator>ChinaHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-134041</guid>
		<description>1895 poem dealing with the Boer war and specifically about the infamous Jameson Raid. Clearly a defeat which led to the Boer war. In Britain, the Jameson Raid was propagandized as a victory. 

Very appropriate poem which pretty well sums up what I have been saying about liberals who spend their time spreading lies in the face of solid truth. The truth seems not to be a part of their mental makeup. The Jameson Raid by 500 Brits was a defeat twisted into victory. 

Let me rephrase so you and the other liberals friends here will understand. The Jameson Raid was a defeat. That is factual. That is truth. Twisting it into a victory in one&#039;s mind does not alter the original fact. You may think you know the truth but you better ask yourself, &quot;Is it twisted to fit my biases or is it really the truth?&quot; 

I have twisted nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1895 poem dealing with the Boer war and specifically about the infamous Jameson Raid. Clearly a defeat which led to the Boer war. In Britain, the Jameson Raid was propagandized as a victory. </p>
<p>Very appropriate poem which pretty well sums up what I have been saying about liberals who spend their time spreading lies in the face of solid truth. The truth seems not to be a part of their mental makeup. The Jameson Raid by 500 Brits was a defeat twisted into victory. </p>
<p>Let me rephrase so you and the other liberals friends here will understand. The Jameson Raid was a defeat. That is factual. That is truth. Twisting it into a victory in one&#8217;s mind does not alter the original fact. You may think you know the truth but you better ask yourself, &#8220;Is it twisted to fit my biases or is it really the truth?&#8221; </p>
<p>I have twisted nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutslikebush</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-133994</link>
		<dc:creator>nutslikebush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2007/bipartisanship/#comment-133994</guid>
		<description>If you can keep your head
While all about you
People are losing theirs and blaming you
If you can trust yourself
When everybody doubts you
And make allowance for their doubting too.

If you can wait
And not get tired of waiting
And when lied about
Stand tall
Don&#039;t deal in lies
And when hated
Don&#039;t give in to hating back
Don&#039;t need to look so good
Don&#039;t need to talk too wise.

If you can dream
And not make dreams your master
If you can think
And not make intellect your game
If you can meet
With triumph and disaster
And treat those two imposters just the same

If you can force your heart
And nerve and sinew
To serve you
After all of them are gone
And so hold on
When there is nothing in you
Nothing but the will
That&#039;s telling you to hold on!
Hold on!

If you can bear to hear
The truth you&#039;ve spoken
Twisted and misconstrued
By some smug fool
Or watch your life&#039;&#039;s work
Torn apart and broken down
And still stoop to build again
With worn out tools.

If you can draw a crowd
And keep your virtue
Or walk with Kings
And keep the common touch
If neither enemies nor loving friends
Can hurt you
If everybody counts with you
But none too much.

If you can fill the journey
Of a minute
With sixty seconds worth of wonder and delight
Then
The Earth is yours
And Everything that&#039;s in it
But more than that
I know
You&#039;ll be alright.

 - Kipling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can keep your head<br />
While all about you<br />
People are losing theirs and blaming you<br />
If you can trust yourself<br />
When everybody doubts you<br />
And make allowance for their doubting too.</p>
<p>If you can wait<br />
And not get tired of waiting<br />
And when lied about<br />
Stand tall<br />
Don&#8217;t deal in lies<br />
And when hated<br />
Don&#8217;t give in to hating back<br />
Don&#8217;t need to look so good<br />
Don&#8217;t need to talk too wise.</p>
<p>If you can dream<br />
And not make dreams your master<br />
If you can think<br />
And not make intellect your game<br />
If you can meet<br />
With triumph and disaster<br />
And treat those two imposters just the same</p>
<p>If you can force your heart<br />
And nerve and sinew<br />
To serve you<br />
After all of them are gone<br />
And so hold on<br />
When there is nothing in you<br />
Nothing but the will<br />
That&#8217;s telling you to hold on!<br />
Hold on!</p>
<p>If you can bear to hear<br />
The truth you&#8217;ve spoken<br />
Twisted and misconstrued<br />
By some smug fool<br />
Or watch your life&#8221;s work<br />
Torn apart and broken down<br />
And still stoop to build again<br />
With worn out tools.</p>
<p>If you can draw a crowd<br />
And keep your virtue<br />
Or walk with Kings<br />
And keep the common touch<br />
If neither enemies nor loving friends<br />
Can hurt you<br />
If everybody counts with you<br />
But none too much.</p>
<p>If you can fill the journey<br />
Of a minute<br />
With sixty seconds worth of wonder and delight<br />
Then<br />
The Earth is yours<br />
And Everything that&#8217;s in it<br />
But more than that<br />
I know<br />
You&#8217;ll be alright.</p>
<p> &#8211; Kipling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
