THE NEW TONE OF CIVILITY

I WONDER WHEN WE’RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE NAACP ON THIS ONE?

Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to THE NEW TONE OF CIVILITY

  1. Castor says:

    Oh please, other side. Look at his comment. How can you NOT make fun of that? Hahaha

  2. The Other Side says:

    what are you talking about castor (its nice to hear from you again though)? you made no point except to insult a liberal. are you trying to yell louder and fling more insults? because that’s really constructive…but that’s not how it works for you. its all about hating liberals and who cares about actually debating policy that benefits america. seems to be a mainstream republican tactic; have you seen newt’s flip flop to oppose obama?

    and i tried your google searches and found that “left-wing radical” yielded 2,190,000 hits and “violent right-wing” yielded 5,160,000 hits. 5,160,000 is bigger than nothing. now you’re just making things up.

  3. Castor says:

    oKAY chuck GLISSON, we HEAR YOU. And BY the WAY, your spastic COMMENTS make it seem as though you have TOURETTES or some kind of DISORDER.

    But ANYWAY, i THINK that this about SUMS UP the STUPID VIOLENT HYPOCRITICAL RHETORIC of the LEFT.

    So stick that IN your crack PIPE and SMOKE it you weasel-brained convulsive sack of humanoid slime! You call the Right hypocritical because “Oh, they only found a FEW people who on the left who instill violence in this video!” Type in violent left-wing radical in google images and see what come up! Then type in violent right-wing. You get nothing.

    And you want us to be afraid of you? Please! Oh yes I’m so scared! Ah! Shiver! Run up a tree!

  4. This video ROCKS!

    It shows that WE THE PEOPLE are SICK AND TIRED of FAKE TEA PARTY MOVEMENTS funded by the KOCH BROTHERS, CROOKED JUDGES like CLARANCE THOMAS, and MORONIC PROPAGANDA such as FAUX NEWS. The maker of this video FAILED in his quest to belittle the Progressive movement, quite the contrary, YOU CLOWNS are JUST NOW getting a little taste as to what a REAL grass roots movement REALLY looks like, be VERY afraid, it ONLY GETS WORSE for ILK of YOUR KIND!

  5. The Other Side says:

    oh i understand that there are liberals out there who say outrageously vile things. there are liberals that do unspeakable acts and should be called out for their extremism. this video shows some of that extremism and i denounce their statements. talking about “hanging,” “killing,” and “shooting” anyone who opposes you is wrong.

    so there you go, i can acknowledge the hatred on my side. can you? i have consistently tried to address the extremism on my side and when there is hatred, i try and denounce it. but when conservatives accuse liberals of being extreme when they’re not, that’s when there’s a problem. and on top of that, conservatives can’t even acknowledge extremists in their own ranks. there is extremes on both sides, so why can conservatives only address the other side?

    zack, you say its impossible to have a “coherent discussion” because i can’t “see the difference?” i have may good faith efforts to understand conservatives, that’s why i’m on this site.

    but you have never addressed my points or answered my questions. there is no effort on your side to understand my side. instead you ignore my requests (you seem to just not answer, exactly like castor) and try and make me find specifics. that diverts the attention away from the conversation to me finding more evidence…even when i have found enough. so the conversation is completely one sided: i have to defend all my views all the time, but you never do. why so afraid to defend the beliefs that you seem to be absolutely sure are true? how can you know 100% for certain that you are correct when you can’t provide the evidence to back it up?

    the reason why its impossible for you to have a conversation with me is because you can’t. you absolutely cannot defend you perspective and therefore don’t want to. again, castor was too overwhelmed to continue debating and it seems like you are too. you might want it to be my fault because i just don’t understand because that allows you an excuse to keep believing what you believe. common zack, acknowledge the extremism on the right. try and defend your points of view instead of attacking liberals. can you do it? probably not, but its worth a shot. at least when you don’t, it proves that i’m right.

  6. zack says:

    You keep missing the parts about “hanging” and “shooting” and “killing”.

    You can’t provide ANY of this kind of violent “rhetoric” from the right.

    It’s impossible to have a coherent discussion as long as you can’t see the difference.
    (see earlier post “Principle vs. Politics -and- Reality vs. Rhetoric”).

  7. The Other Side says:

    can you find mainstream radical statements made from liberals instead of finding random people? if you want to play that game, what do you think people on the right are saying?

    how can you take the words of these random people so seriously but virtually ignore the glenn becks out there? oh yeah, because you don’t want to pay attention to your side’s rhetoric.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>