Comments for Laugh At Liberals Weblog

Comment on NUCLEAR OR NUCULAR? by -dan z-

-dan z- — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:06:09 +0000

To “The Other Side:”

The author gave specific examples (these are known as “facts”) to support his thesis. You have given us propaganda.

Comment on NUCLEAR OR NUCULAR? by The Other Side

The Other Side — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:36:55 +0000

big difference in education between obama and bush. there is no question that obama is highly educated but there were questions about bush’s intelligence.

its amazing that this is an example about how the media is biased towards obama. that could be further from the truth. how many of the lies about health care have been propagated as news by the media? how often are republicans brought on television and allowed to lie?

there is no longer a liberal bias in media. in the media’s eyes, no republican can do wrong and liberals are crazy.

Comment on AMERICA ON TRAIL…IN NEW YORK by The Other Side

The Other Side — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:24:38 +0000

ok, young conservative. did you see that the underwear bomber freely gave actionable information about the terrorist organization that recruited him? and he was given american rights. he has a lawyer, read his miranda rights, will get a trial. he was not tortured or held indefinitely for no reason.

the american judicial system works and the information provided by the underwear bomber is proof. that is why i think the fear behind this situation and the trials in new york are unfounded.

Comment on Political Quotes by akshay

akshay — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:26:32 +0000

hey i am really overwhelmed by such qoutes ,all r awe some

Comment on WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU: The Boston Tea Party All Over Again by The Other Side

The Other Side — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:33:07 +0000

young conservative, so because i disagree with you that means you can’t stand me? that kind of partisanship is splitting washington and the country. and there is a right wing media, its fox news.

buck, kaiser was the one who said that the tea partiers gave themselves the nickname, not me. mass. voters were opposed to the current health care bill, but not only for the reasons that republicans give. some voters wanted a more progressive bill and were against the current moderate bill. they voted for the person who opposed the bill which was brown. and hoffmann was the right’s candidate because the republican candidate conceded. the republicans didn’t field a candidate. the fact that she got any votes when she wasn’t on the ticket shows how split the party is. it was a strongly conservative district so it was more impressive that a democrat won.

Comment on Punxsutawney Phil Hates Global Warming by Young Conservative

Young Conservative — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:22:21 +0000

This is great! I love it.

Comment on WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU: The Boston Tea Party All Over Again by Zack

Zack — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:02:39 +0000

The Tea “partiers” are not a political party, as far as having candidates. As far as being a “mainstream political movement”…..they already are. More Americans now consider themselves conservatives than anything else, not Republican, but conservative. The tea-party supported candidate won in IL. They are watching AR. right now. Lincoln is in their crosshairs (personally, I like Jim Holt, but the lack of money and the fire to sell himself is gonna be a problem in the primary).

Comment on ANOTHER LYING LIAR AND THE LYING LIARS WHO HELP THEM LIE by Giant Claw Jr

Giant Claw Jr — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:56:48 +0000

Of course liberals are lying just listen to them on the news shows and you can hear first hand their lies

Comment on WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU: The Boston Tea Party All Over Again by Buck

Buck — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:22:10 +0000

Other Side you seem to be forgetting that Brown’s victory comes after conservative victories in Virginia and New Jersey. Places where the opposition Democrats were not quite as lackluster as Coakley. You are delusional if you somehow think that the people of Massachusetts voted for Scott Brown because they wanted a more liberal version of ObamaCare. His entire campaign was based on “I will vote against this health care program.” By the way, the “Tea Party Movement” did not give themselves that nickname. That came from Keith Oberman. As for the Tea Party conservative that lost the election in New York you’ve got your facts wrong and you’re missing the elephant in the room. Douglas Hoffman was a third party candidate from the Conservative Party. The Republican’s ran a closet Democrat, who split the vote. For a “movement” such as the Conservative Party to field a candidate and only lose by about 4900 votes is a pretty big accomplishment.

Comment on WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU: The Boston Tea Party All Over Again by Young Conservative

Young Conservative — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:24:30 +0000

I really can’t stand you. Thats all I have to say, besides that Texas had reserved the right to secede before they ever became a state. And the right wing media?Oh, please. Give me a break.