<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Laugh At Liberals Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog</link>
	<description>a site for people in their right mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on THE NEW ERKEL by The Other Side</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2009/the-new-erkel/#comment-221971</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Side</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=922#comment-221971</guid>
		<description>buck, you actually believe that obama is socialist?  if so, then what policies that obama has enacted have made america socialist?  

glenn beck is a coward that fuels america&#039;s growing partisianship.  nothing he says is backed by any facts and he makes no sense.  glenn beck is what&#039;s wrong with american politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buck, you actually believe that obama is socialist?  if so, then what policies that obama has enacted have made america socialist?  </p>
<p>glenn beck is a coward that fuels america&#8217;s growing partisianship.  nothing he says is backed by any facts and he makes no sense.  glenn beck is what&#8217;s wrong with american politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Most Disgusting Health Care Deal Of All by Sven</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2010/the-most-disgusting-health-care-deal-of-all/#comment-221921</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=1049#comment-221921</guid>
		<description>IT was fake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT was fake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE NEW ERKEL by Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2009/the-new-erkel/#comment-221878</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=922#comment-221878</guid>
		<description>This is the weirdest comment thread ever. Liberals have no sense of humor. They can&#039;t laugh at themsleves and they only find humor in hatred. It a by-product of having your nose so far up in the air all the time. 

For the record, Glenn Beck has helped all of us, tremendously by outing the hidden communist and socialists in Obama administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the weirdest comment thread ever. Liberals have no sense of humor. They can&#8217;t laugh at themsleves and they only find humor in hatred. It a by-product of having your nose so far up in the air all the time. </p>
<p>For the record, Glenn Beck has helped all of us, tremendously by outing the hidden communist and socialists in Obama administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ITS NOT NICE TO BLAME MOTHER NATURE by Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2010/its-not-nice-to-blame-mother-nature/#comment-221870</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=1043#comment-221870</guid>
		<description>Colder weather is proof of global warming? Hmmm...so...higher unemployment is proof of an economic recovery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colder weather is proof of global warming? Hmmm&#8230;so&#8230;higher unemployment is proof of an economic recovery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Most Disgusting Health Care Deal Of All by Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2010/the-most-disgusting-health-care-deal-of-all/#comment-221868</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=1049#comment-221868</guid>
		<description>That deal SMELTS! Something fishy there, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That deal SMELTS! Something fishy there, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Same-sex Marriage Ban Initiatives by Late To The Party</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2006/same-sex-marriage-ban-initiatives/#comment-221812</link>
		<dc:creator>Late To The Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2006/same-sex-marriage-ban-initiatives/#comment-221812</guid>
		<description>To everyone saying that we shouldn&#039;t change &#039;tradition&#039;: I guess you still want slavery, then, because back when slavery allowed most slave owners believed it to be a tradition.

To everyone saying homosexuality is unnatural: We totally haven&#039;t gotten used to anything unnatural. Nope, never got used to air conditions or automobiles or anything like that.

If anyone is thinking/saying that gay couples will make gay children: Yes, we totally would. Because EVERY straight couple makes straight children, so of course children raised by a gay couple will end up gay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To everyone saying that we shouldn&#8217;t change &#8216;tradition&#8217;: I guess you still want slavery, then, because back when slavery allowed most slave owners believed it to be a tradition.</p>
<p>To everyone saying homosexuality is unnatural: We totally haven&#8217;t gotten used to anything unnatural. Nope, never got used to air conditions or automobiles or anything like that.</p>
<p>If anyone is thinking/saying that gay couples will make gay children: Yes, we totally would. Because EVERY straight couple makes straight children, so of course children raised by a gay couple will end up gay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE NEW ERKEL by because only a "smart person" would have that name</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2009/the-new-erkel/#comment-221791</link>
		<dc:creator>because only a "smart person" would have that name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=922#comment-221791</guid>
		<description>ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, BECAUSE GLENN BECK IS TOO BUSY ACTUALLY FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM ELSEWHERE. THAT MEANS WE&#039;LL HAVE TO MAKE DO HERE ON THE HOME FRONT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, BECAUSE GLENN BECK IS TOO BUSY ACTUALLY FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM ELSEWHERE. THAT MEANS WE&#8217;LL HAVE TO MAKE DO HERE ON THE HOME FRONT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE NEW ERKEL by smarter than you morons</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2009/the-new-erkel/#comment-221708</link>
		<dc:creator>smarter than you morons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=922#comment-221708</guid>
		<description>GLENN BECK WON&#039;T HELP YOU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GLENN BECK WON&#8217;T HELP YOU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DO YOU MISS ME YET? by The Other Side</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2010/do-you-miss-me-yet/#comment-221212</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Side</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=1023#comment-221212</guid>
		<description>government plays an integral part in regulating the economy.  just look what happened when congress deregulated the markets, it brought us to recession.

it is true that some people shouldn&#039;t have agreed to mortgages that they couldn&#039;t afford, but that is not why the economy collapsed.  people bought and sold bundled mortgages, securities, which created a bubble in the markets.  people were throwing around money that was assumed to be there.  and when people began to default and the money stopped flowing, the bubble burst.

it was fundamental irresponsiblity by wall street and their reckless buying and selling of mortgages that caused the melt down.  blaming this crisis on poor people that couldn&#039;t pay their mortgages is a tired conservative line.  where is the anger at the bankers that ruined the economy and are still getting million dollar bonuses?

deregulation allowed wall street to be reckless and they assumed, rightly, that the government was going to bail them out.  the government doesn&#039;t want to spread the wealth (just a side note, does buck want all the wealth to be at the top?).  it needs to regulate the private sector from making irresponsible decisions based on greed.  

and thats where conservatism comes in.  one of the fundamental tenents of conservatism is a belief in the private sector and a smaller government.  that assumes that the private sector will police itself and function ethically.  unfortunately thats not what happens.  there needs to be regulation to prevent recessions.  conservatives had eight years to build upon clinton&#039;s surplus and failed.  and now they try and blame liberals for trying to clean up their mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>government plays an integral part in regulating the economy.  just look what happened when congress deregulated the markets, it brought us to recession.</p>
<p>it is true that some people shouldn&#8217;t have agreed to mortgages that they couldn&#8217;t afford, but that is not why the economy collapsed.  people bought and sold bundled mortgages, securities, which created a bubble in the markets.  people were throwing around money that was assumed to be there.  and when people began to default and the money stopped flowing, the bubble burst.</p>
<p>it was fundamental irresponsiblity by wall street and their reckless buying and selling of mortgages that caused the melt down.  blaming this crisis on poor people that couldn&#8217;t pay their mortgages is a tired conservative line.  where is the anger at the bankers that ruined the economy and are still getting million dollar bonuses?</p>
<p>deregulation allowed wall street to be reckless and they assumed, rightly, that the government was going to bail them out.  the government doesn&#8217;t want to spread the wealth (just a side note, does buck want all the wealth to be at the top?).  it needs to regulate the private sector from making irresponsible decisions based on greed.  </p>
<p>and thats where conservatism comes in.  one of the fundamental tenents of conservatism is a belief in the private sector and a smaller government.  that assumes that the private sector will police itself and function ethically.  unfortunately thats not what happens.  there needs to be regulation to prevent recessions.  conservatives had eight years to build upon clinton&#8217;s surplus and failed.  and now they try and blame liberals for trying to clean up their mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DO YOU MISS ME YET? by Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2010/do-you-miss-me-yet/#comment-221059</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/?p=1023#comment-221059</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and no one ever seems to remember this back from 2003, when Bush argued for MORE regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, supported by the company itself but opposed by good ole Barney Frank: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/11/business/new-agency-proposed-to-oversee-freddie-mac-and-fannie-mae.html?sec=&amp;spon=&amp;pagewanted=print</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and no one ever seems to remember this back from 2003, when Bush argued for MORE regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, supported by the company itself but opposed by good ole Barney Frank: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/11/business/new-agency-proposed-to-oversee-freddie-mac-and-fannie-mae.html?sec=&amp;spon=&amp;pagewanted=print" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/11/business/new-agency-proposed-to-oversee-freddie-mac-and-fannie-mae.html?sec=&amp;spon=&amp;pagewanted=print</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
