<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Laugh At Liberals Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laughatliberals.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com</link>
	<description>a site for people in their right mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA&#8217;S OPPOSITES by Castor</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/obamas-opposites/#comment-251131</link>
		<dc:creator>Castor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1304#comment-251131</guid>
		<description>Liberals don&#039;t know how to take an insult.

Thought I was gonna say joke? Nah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals don&#8217;t know how to take an insult.</p>
<p>Thought I was gonna say joke? Nah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA&#8217;S OPPOSITES by The Other Side</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/obamas-opposites/#comment-251130</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Side</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1304#comment-251130</guid>
		<description>say more yirmaster...you seem to have some very strong opinions that are opposite of mine.  defend your views and provide evidence to refute my statements.  

are you going to be like every other tea partier by shouting and screaming without actually contributing to the debate?  or are you just so ill informed that you can use knowledge to defend your &quot;rebuttal?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>say more yirmaster&#8230;you seem to have some very strong opinions that are opposite of mine.  defend your views and provide evidence to refute my statements.  </p>
<p>are you going to be like every other tea partier by shouting and screaming without actually contributing to the debate?  or are you just so ill informed that you can use knowledge to defend your &#8220;rebuttal?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA&#8217;S OPPOSITES by YIRMASTER</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/obamas-opposites/#comment-251128</link>
		<dc:creator>YIRMASTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1304#comment-251128</guid>
		<description>WOW!!! &quot;The other side&quot; is so far detached from reality I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s worth it to even comment. 

This person sounds like a recording of Obama talking out of one side of his mouth while he does the opposite but says he not doing whatever it is he IS doing and saying it enough times that his idiot sheeple jump on the bandwagon. Uhhg!!! Morons!!!

Maybe that statement in itself should be the extent of my rebuttal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!! &#8220;The other side&#8221; is so far detached from reality I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s worth it to even comment. </p>
<p>This person sounds like a recording of Obama talking out of one side of his mouth while he does the opposite but says he not doing whatever it is he IS doing and saying it enough times that his idiot sheeple jump on the bandwagon. Uhhg!!! Morons!!!</p>
<p>Maybe that statement in itself should be the extent of my rebuttal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRAZY UNCLE RON by Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/crazy-uncle-ron/#comment-251126</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1318#comment-251126</guid>
		<description>Daniel,
Iran is a threat. They have been the chief state sponsor of terrorism since the Shah was ousted. They have, as a central and motivating tennant of their theocracy the complete destruction of Israel and the conversion to Islam or death of all western infidels. Those are not my suppositions, that&#039;s what they say. 

Ron Paul&#039;s libertarianism basically states that a strong defense is one of the few legitimate powers of the federal government. I agree with that, but the problem is, the horse is already out of the barn. The reason his foreign policy is dangerous is that whether we like it or not, America IS the world&#039;s policeman. Without our direct intervention, individual rights and freedom will be trampled all over the world. The only thing needed for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing. It was true prior to WW II and it&#039;s true today. I admire Ron Paul&#039;s America First stance, but the void left by America pulling back from every corner of the world will be filled by something. Are you willing to gamble on who or what that might be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,<br />
Iran is a threat. They have been the chief state sponsor of terrorism since the Shah was ousted. They have, as a central and motivating tennant of their theocracy the complete destruction of Israel and the conversion to Islam or death of all western infidels. Those are not my suppositions, that&#8217;s what they say. </p>
<p>Ron Paul&#8217;s libertarianism basically states that a strong defense is one of the few legitimate powers of the federal government. I agree with that, but the problem is, the horse is already out of the barn. The reason his foreign policy is dangerous is that whether we like it or not, America IS the world&#8217;s policeman. Without our direct intervention, individual rights and freedom will be trampled all over the world. The only thing needed for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing. It was true prior to WW II and it&#8217;s true today. I admire Ron Paul&#8217;s America First stance, but the void left by America pulling back from every corner of the world will be filled by something. Are you willing to gamble on who or what that might be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CRAZY UNCLE RON by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/crazy-uncle-ron/#comment-251125</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1318#comment-251125</guid>
		<description>You say his foreign policy is dangerous, but why is that so? I think people need to look at the motives of their arguments when they say things like that.

We talked about fear-mongering when we went into Iraq and then we talked about it when the Dems were convincing the people to vote for them in the mid-terms. This is just more of that. There is no real threat from Iran. Anyone telling you that there is a threat from Iran is simply demagoguing. They are speaking in platitudes.

Ron Paul&#039;s foreign policy isn&#039;t to do nothing when a legitimate threat arises....it is to quit manufacturing threats for ourselves. Blowback IS a legitimate concept and exists in reality. Our constant meddling in sovereign countries and their affairs creates enemies all over the world. Sure, we have every right to retaliate when someone strikes us, but we have a significant moral issue if we don&#039;t recognize their original strike as retaliatory against our meddling.

Iran doesn&#039;t hate us because of Muslim extremism. That is just the tool their hatred has used to stir the pot. It is the same as the crusades. Nobody that looks at the actual message of Christ could rationalize those actions, but the fear and hatred were already in place, so they used religion to stir up the passion necessary to go to war.

All of the other Republican candidates are doing the same.

Economically it isn&#039;t even a contest. Ron Paul kicks the crap out of every other candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say his foreign policy is dangerous, but why is that so? I think people need to look at the motives of their arguments when they say things like that.</p>
<p>We talked about fear-mongering when we went into Iraq and then we talked about it when the Dems were convincing the people to vote for them in the mid-terms. This is just more of that. There is no real threat from Iran. Anyone telling you that there is a threat from Iran is simply demagoguing. They are speaking in platitudes.</p>
<p>Ron Paul&#8217;s foreign policy isn&#8217;t to do nothing when a legitimate threat arises&#8230;.it is to quit manufacturing threats for ourselves. Blowback IS a legitimate concept and exists in reality. Our constant meddling in sovereign countries and their affairs creates enemies all over the world. Sure, we have every right to retaliate when someone strikes us, but we have a significant moral issue if we don&#8217;t recognize their original strike as retaliatory against our meddling.</p>
<p>Iran doesn&#8217;t hate us because of Muslim extremism. That is just the tool their hatred has used to stir the pot. It is the same as the crusades. Nobody that looks at the actual message of Christ could rationalize those actions, but the fear and hatred were already in place, so they used religion to stir up the passion necessary to go to war.</p>
<p>All of the other Republican candidates are doing the same.</p>
<p>Economically it isn&#8217;t even a contest. Ron Paul kicks the crap out of every other candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did they say FREE? by Castor</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/did-they-say-free/#comment-251124</link>
		<dc:creator>Castor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1162#comment-251124</guid>
		<description>Funny joke haha. I love little Johnny.

Albert, have some humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny joke haha. I love little Johnny.</p>
<p>Albert, have some humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did they say FREE? by Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/did-they-say-free/#comment-251123</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1162#comment-251123</guid>
		<description>yeah Albert, &#039;cause we all know there&#039;s no waste in government, and the only people applying for government aide are hard working people down on their luck. They, of course, will get off the tax-payers back once they get on their feet again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah Albert, &#8217;cause we all know there&#8217;s no waste in government, and the only people applying for government aide are hard working people down on their luck. They, of course, will get off the tax-payers back once they get on their feet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did they say FREE? by AlbertRoss</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2011/did-they-say-free/#comment-251122</link>
		<dc:creator>AlbertRoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laughatliberals.com/?p=1162#comment-251122</guid>
		<description>Free crap? Like health care? Or food assistance? Yeah, I&#039;ll bet those old and sick people who need those things just think it&#039;s awful that someone wants to give it away, for free. Yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free crap? Like health care? Or food assistance? Yeah, I&#8217;ll bet those old and sick people who need those things just think it&#8217;s awful that someone wants to give it away, for free. Yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kerry Gains Support by Castor</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/kerry-gains-support/#comment-251107</link>
		<dc:creator>Castor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=68#comment-251107</guid>
		<description>Dude. It&#039;s been nearly 7 YEARS since someone last replied to this. Please stop necroposting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude. It&#8217;s been nearly 7 YEARS since someone last replied to this. Please stop necroposting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WHAT WOULD KERRY DO?: PART II by Castor</title>
		<link>http://www.laughatliberals.com/blog/archives/2004/what-would-kerry-do-part-ii/#comment-251106</link>
		<dc:creator>Castor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=64#comment-251106</guid>
		<description>Stop posting pointless necroposts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop posting pointless necroposts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

